"Think of socialism like a fancy baked good"

"It is imperative in science to doubt; it is absolutely necessary, for progress in science, to have uncertainty as a fundamental part of your inner nature. To make progress in understanding, we must remain modest and allow that we do not know. Nothing is certain or proved beyond all doubt."
"The communist views are the antithesis of the scientific, in the sense that in communism the answers are given to all the questions — political questions as well as moral ones — without discussion and without doubt. The scientific viewpoint is the exact opposite of this; that is, all questions must be doubted and discussed; we must argue everything out."
"As I reported yesterday, not only do deaths in nursing homes now compose more than 50% (and in some states as high as 80%) of total deaths from the beginning of the entire epidemic, that percentage is sharply increasing in every state day by day. This means that nearly all the new deaths, depending on the state, are occurring in nursing homes. Every state has a recorded death count that you can track by date, but the recording of the subcategory of nursing home deaths is pretty new in most states."This information wasn't being published separately nor was it collected in a timely manner. Horowitz goes on to document new numbers from fifteen states.
"The Coronavirus crisis is reaping big political benefits for Democrats. President Trump’s signature achievement—a booming economy with record low unemployment, rising middle-class wages, and a sky-high stock market—lies in tatters. President Trump has been denied access to his only stimulant—energetic political rallies where he connects directly with supporters across the country. Instead, the president has been stuck in Washington, D.C., listening to the advice of “experts” who used fraudulent models to convince him in late March to “shut down” the country. Trump’s rival, Joe Biden, has been safely shuttered away in his home studio where he struggles to read teleprompter scripts or offer articulate responses to softball questions from late-night hosts. The Democratic National Convention has been canceled so the American electorate won’t be able to assess Biden’s frailty and incoherence on a national stage a few months before Election Day.
The Centers for Disease Control is looking more and more like the 2020 version of James Comey’s FBI. The agency that foisted the disastrous experiment of “social distancing” on 330 million unwitting American lab rats continues to inveigh on matters far beyond its purview or expertise. The CDC has prepared yet another outlandish plan to prolong the nation’s misery. ...
As one would expect, the guidance is a labyrinth of costly, unconstitutional, and draconian recommendations that would result in a permanent paranoid police state for the foreseeable future...
This latest guidance, however, isn’t the only politically-motivated stunt coming from the CDC. The agency has published a series of voting recommendations that fulfill long-sought goals of the Democratic Party. This includes mail-in ballots and early voting."
It seems that many coronavirus deaths were caused because political taboos, bureaucratic fiefdoms and virtue-signaling mandates stood in the way of common sense action. The system was paralyzed by its own rhetoric. To a great extent the bureaucratic empires performed as designed. They used the crises to capture budget increases and inflate their power while carefully avoiding anything politically incorrect. A winning strategy in normal times, a disaster in the present. Even though the press coverage is designed to make one side look stupid it has had the unintended effect of making everyone look imbecilic, including the press itself. Nothing about the people on TV inspires confidence. Nothing.
"Undocumented equations, no bounds checking, side effects of ad hoc code unknown among other possible problems. They didn't fully understand what their own model was modeling. If true this is a far more serious problem than Ferguson having an affair, tantamount to relying on a ouija board to guide important decisions. It sounds like they had a poorly understood problem with state, reentrants and maybe race conditions. Basically the accusation is that Imperial's model is legacy code based on assumptions nobody understands and gives different results for the same inputs."
"In the absence of externally provided schools, indigenously supported settings were responsible for the creation and transmission of popular literacy. Thus, over several centuries, the literate popular culture of England largely made itself."
"One final thought, from a U.S. perspective: Hu Shih famously preferred solving concrete problems to wallowing in abstract political theory. But let me break his rule against discussing “isms” to ask whether China today would benefit from a little less nationalism and a little more populism. Democratic populism is less about left versus right than top versus bottom. It’s about reminding a few that they need the consent of many to govern. When a privileged few grow too remote and self-interested, populism is what pulls them back or pitches them overboard. It has a kinetic energy. It fueled the Brexit vote of 2015 and President Trump’s election in 2016. It moved the founder of your university to pen a declaration of independence in 1776. It is an admonition to the powerful of this country to remember who they’re supposed to work for: America first.
Wasn’t a similar idea beating in the heart of the May Fourth Movement, too? Weren’t Hu Shih’s language reforms a declaration of war against aristocratic pretension? Weren’t they a broadside against the Confucian power structure that enforced conformity over free thought? Wasn’t the goal to achieve citizen-centric government in China, and not replace one regime-centric model with another one? The world will wait for the Chinese people to furnish the answers."
The United States and the United Kingdom are the first and fifth largest economies in the world, respectively. Total two-way trade between the two countries is already worth about $269 billion a year. Each country is the other’s largest source of foreign direct investment, with about $1 trillion invested in each other’s economies. Every day, around one million Americans go to work for UK firms, while around one million Britons go to work for American firms.
Initial viral load seems likely to have a large impact on severity of Covid-19 infection. If we believe this, we should take this seriously, and evaluate both general policy and personal behavior differently in light of this information. We should also do our best to confirm or deny this hypothesis as soon as possible.
The failure to collect more and better information about Covid-19 has been atrocious, shameful, expensive and deadly.What can those masks do? Less than you imagine. The bat virus is about 125 billionths of a meter across. The highest-rated hospital-grade N95 masks stop 95% of the particles that are 300 billionths of an inch across. And only if properly fitted. In other words, you can expect about one in twenty to get through. Those virus copies mostly aren't floating around like little no-seeums on their own but are in much larger water droplets breathed, sneezed and coughed, about 3000 droplets per cough. A realistic goal of a mask is to stop fine spray getting up your nose. to reduce incoming viral load. And to protect others from the same, but then you shouldn't be that close to them in the first place. If the virus you fear is in your neighbourhood, you'll probably pick up some copies. That's with or without social distancing and with or without a mask. But you can reduce the viral load.
![]() |
Light load of wind (virus) |
Mostly we’re not collecting any data at all that isn’t massively biased.
The more I think about the Covid-19 situation, the more I think the highest leverage thing most people reading this can do is to find ways to get our hands on better data.
Heavy load of wind (virus)
Michael Levitt, professor of structural biology at Stanford Medical School and winner of the 2013 Nobel Prize in chemistry, recently stated, “There is no doubt in my mind that when we come to look back on this, the damage done by lockdown will exceed any saving of lives by a huge factor.”One side of the balance sheet is trumpeted while the costs in economic ruin are currently "de-platformed". It's like the joke about a SWAT team chasing terrorists who run into a department store. The team locks into place around the shop next door, "because it has fewer exits". The workplace and its diseases are more complex than the lockdown narrative. People with a badge of office and a received narrative have launched a simplistic experiment in economic destruction. They don't know what will happen. They hope it will make them look good and lives will be saved. Looking good trumps saving lives.
Julie Kelly at American Greatness: "The history of science, sadly, is littered with bad experiments gone horribly wrong. The Great Social Distancing Experiment of 2020, when it is over, will very likely be toward the top of that list."She points out that a sensible experiment in "bending the curve" to avoid overloading ICU resources isn't currently needed but the lockdown fever burns on. The correlation is missing between how much many lives were manacled with lockdowns and how many people were ill.
![]() |
Chart source CDC stats, reported here. |
A
here.